<?php
require_once('utils.inc.php');
logger("started");
logger("* about to call session_start()");
session_start();
if (!isset($_SESSION['c'])) $_SESSION['c']=0;
if ((integer)$_SESSION['c'] && !($_SESSION['c'] % 3)) {
logger("* about to regenerate");
session_regenerate_id();
}
++$_SESSION['c'];
logger("about to finish");
session_write_close();
?>
<html>
<H1>The Built In Handler</H1>
<p>
This script is here to give you an idea of how the performance
of the custom handlers compares with the buit in handler.
</p><p>
Running this on a test machine, not doing much else, and you'll probably be disappointed, though not very surprised
to find that the builtin handler is a lot faster (around 6 times faster on the machine I'm typing this on) than
the custom handlers. But when the traffic volumes ramp up and compete with more meaningful transactions, you'll
see a performance advantage using the nonblocking and/or writeSometimes handlers (remember, you can use both!).
<br />
We can't inject a debug logger into the script so the details below only show what is happening outside the handler:<br />
<?php
print "OK:++\$_SESSION['c']=" . $_SESSION['c'] . "<pre>$statuslog</pre>";
exit;
|
Download
